Bridging finance: the ultimate guide

Last updated: 6 October 2017

Few things in property are as misunderstood as bridging finance.

Many investors – even those who are fairly experienced – find it scary and confusing. It has a reputation for being risky, expensive, and even somehow “shady”.

It’s true that in the past, a lot of bridging lenders were less-than-angelic characters who’d happily whip your house away from you in an instant if you couldn’t repay. As the sector has matured, that’s no longer the case – but it is still relatively expensive, and can be confusing.

Used properly though, it can be a powerful tool – allowing you to do profitable deals that wouldn’t otherwise have been possible.

So in this guide, I’ll run through everything you need to know to use bridging finance with confidence – starting with the very basics…

Contents

Chapter 1

Bridging basics

There's a certain air of mystery around bridging finance, and the easiest way to remove that mystery is to think of bridging as just a short-term mortgage.

It's different in some important ways, which we'll cover soon. But bridging and mortgages are more similar than they are different...

The most important and obvious similarities are:

So far, so similar. But there are important differences too…

How does bridging differ from a mortgage?

The most important difference is the duration: you’ll often take a mortgage out for 25 years or more, but bridging is generally for 12 months or less.

The other noticeable difference (and not in a good way) is the cost. Mortgage rates at the moment are under 5% per year for most borrowers, but bridging tends to be 8% at the very lowest end – all the way up to 15% or more.

Those are the most obvious differences when you sit down and compare the two. But there are other differences too – and it’s these that allow you to use bridging in creative and interesting ways:

First and second charge lending

As we’ll see in more detail later, lenders take a “charge” over the property to secure their loan. This charge is noted on the Land Registry, and means that you can’t sell the property or raise money against it without the approval of the lender – and also means that the lender can force the sale of the property to get their money back if you don’t repay.

Most lending is on a “first charge” basis – meaning that you take out a loan from just one lender, and they’re first in line to claim the proceeds when the property is sold. But it’s also possible to get a “second charge” loan: if you have a loan already you can take out an additional loan, and the second lender sits behind the first in order of priority.

This doesn’t mean that you could have two lenders each lending you 70% of the property’s value. Clearly, both need to get paid back from the sale of the property if anything goes wrong – so the two loans combined can only add up to somewhere in the region of 70% in total.

A second charge loan can be useful if – for example – you have a longstanding mortgage against a property for 30% of its value which you want to keep because it has a low interest rate, but you also want to raise additional funds. There are two things to bear in mind though:

  1. The first charge lender will need to consent to a second charge lender coming in behind them. Some won’t allow it, because it’s a potential source of complication and hassle that doesn’t really benefit them in any way.
  2. Second charge lending is more risky for the lender, because if they need to force sale of the property they’re only second in line for the proceeds. As a results, interest rates tend to be higher.

Chapter 2

Why use bridging finance?

Given that bridging finance is more expensive than a mortgage and for a shorter duration, there needs to be a good reason for using it – and there are three main situations where it can be valuable...

The first is in situation where you don’t want to hold the property for very long – or you want to remortgage quickly to realise an increase in value.

For example, say you want to flip a property. You shouldn’t use a mortgage, because a mortgage is intended to be held for a number of years – so cash or bridging are your only options.

Alternatively, you might want to refurbish a house to increase its value then borrow against its higher value. In that situation, bridging is appropriate too: use bridging to increase the value, then take out a mortgage based on its new value.

The second is a situation where speed matters. Because you can arrange bridging in weeks rather than months, it allows you to compete with cash buyers in situations where you can get a good deal by moving quickly. Auctions are one example, but also any case where the seller is willing to sell at a discount if you can complete quicker than a mortgage would allow you to.

The third is where the property isn’t mortgageable. From a mortgage lender’s point of view the property doesn’t need to be a palace, but it needs to be habitable (and therefore rentable) before they’ll lend against it.

That’s a problem if you want to buy a wreck of a property at a good price then bring it back up to scratch. You can’t get a mortgage against the property when it’s a wreck – but you could use bridging instead (as lenders are less fussy), then take out a mortgage to repay the bridging loan once you’ve finished the refurbishment.

Of course, these situations overlap too. Often properties that are in disrepair and are unmortgageable are being sold quickly (sometimes at auction). Often too, you might not want to hold this property for very long – just enough time to refurbish then sell on again for a profit.

There are plenty of other cases where bridging comes in useful – some of them more advanced – but these are the majority of situations you’ll come across.

Chapter 3

How much can you borrow?

The size of bridging loan you can take out is based entirely on the value of the property – and factors like the amount of rental income and your own personal income don't come into it. However, different lenders look at value in different ways – which creates complication, but also opportunity...

Understanding loan-to-value

From your experience with mortgages (even if just on your own home), you’ll already know what loan-to-value is: the size of the loan divided by the price of the property. So a loan of £75,000 against a £100,000 property will have an LTV of 75%.

But what determines the “value” part in the case of bridging?

For mortgages, the “value” of a property will always be the lower of its current value or the purchase price. In other words, if a property would be worth £100,000 on the open market but you’ve snaffled it for £85,000, the lender will value it at £85,000. If they’re prepared to give you an LTV of 70%, that means you can borrow £59,500 (70% of £85,000) rather than the £70,000 (70% of £100,000) you might have wanted.

In the case of bridging, it’s often no different. But some bridging lenders (including my company, LendSwift) will lend based on just the current market value – and ignore what you paid for it. So in our example above, you would be able to borrow based on the true £100,000 value – and therefore borrow more money, assuming the same LTV.

Some lenders (again, LendSwift is one) will also offer loans based on the Gross Development Value (GDV) – which means what the property will be worth once you’ve completed your planned works on it.

Continuing the same example, say that once you’ve given the property a comprehensive refurb it will be worth £120,000. A lender might then give you (say) 70% of this figure – which is £84,000. Initially they’ll only give you an amount based on its current value, but they’ll give you the extra at the end once you’ve done the work to increase the value – or give it to you in stages as work progresses.

If you can find a lender who’ll lend based on market value and also contribute to the cost of the works (by lending against GDV), you’ll be able to borrow more money than you otherwise would. This is obvious to see when you consider the exact same situation assessed by three lenders with different criteria:

Bought for £85,000, 70% LTV based on purchase price: £59,500
Bought for £85,000, 70% LTV based on true market value of £100,000: £70,000
Bought for £85,000, 70% LTV based on GDV of £120,000: £84,000

If you’re trying to stretch your cash as far as possible so you can afford to do a project, that’s a big difference. But remember: borrowing more means higher interest charges, which you’ll need to factor into the cost of completing the project.

The importance of the valuation

Just like with a mortgage, the bridging lender will instruct a RICS-qualified surveyor to inspect the property and determine its value. And just like with a mortgage valuation, you might be disappointed by the figure they decide on.

You’re almost guaranteed to disagree with their valuation, because you’ll be looking at the project optimistically and they’ll be playing it safe so they can’t get into trouble with the lender later. It’s just one of those things: to reduce the risk of a valuation scuppering your plans, try to work off conservative numbers so you’ll still be able to get the loan you want even if the valuer doesn’t share your optimism.

If you already have your own valuation, it will almost never be sufficient: the lender will want to instruct their own valuation, which you’ll need to pay for. In some circumstances, if you have a recent valuation a lender might agree to that valuation being updated so it’s addressed to them: this means that the lender can take legal action against the valuer if they later lose money as the result of an inaccurate valuation. The valuer will sometimes charge to re-address a valuation (which you’ll have to pay for), but it’ll be much cheaper than getting a whole new one.

What else will lenders want to know?

The valuation is the main factor that determines how much you can borrow. Unlike with a mortgage, the lender doesn’t need to probe endlessly into your situation, your ability to afford repayments, the rent the property would achieve, and so on. It’s this simplicity that gives bridging its speed and power.

But depending on the lender, there are other factors related to you, not the property, that they might want to get to the bottom of before agreeing the loan:

The emphasis that lenders put on these “non-property factors” will depend on their attitude to risk and the type of lending they like to do. Some lenders really aren’t too fussed – knowing that if you default they can force sale of the property to get paid back anyway, and probably charge huge penalty fees so they end up making more money than they would have done if you’d paid them back on time. Others (like LendSwift) are far more minded to turn down projects they don’t believe will succeed, because they don’t relish having loans default and having to go through the repossession process.

Chapter 4

Bridging loan structure and fees

It can be challenging to compare competing bridging loans, because every lender structures things slightly differently and charges an array of various fees. Just like when we were considering how bridging lenders value properties, this variation is confusing at first – but gives you a lot of flexibility too.

The fees you’ll need to pay

The interest rate is just one component of the cost of bridging: loans also come with fees, which can be the most painful part of the experience.

It’s hard to generalise about the level of fees because they vary wildly between lenders. To give a ballpark estimate though, you might find yourself needing to pay:

So as well as the interest, you can find yourself paying 3% of the total loan in fees plus two sets of legal fees. Yup, bridging finance isn’t cheap: but if it allows you to do profitable deal that wouldn’t otherwise have been possible, it’s worth it.

Lender fees are all over the place. Each lender will charge different fees, call them different things, and structure loans in different ways – which is why a broker can be useful to help you find the most suitable deal. Although the broker, of course, will charge a fee of their own.

The lenders with the lowest fees tend – as you might expect – to be the most picky about what they’ll lend on. So if you’re very experienced and you want to borrow under 50% of the property’s value for a straightforward project – and you’re not in a rush – you can probably find a lender with very competitive fees. On the other hand if it’s your first project and you want to borrow as much as you can quickly, you’ll have to expect to pay more.

Structuring the loan

The fees associated with the loan will usually be deducted from the gross advance before it’s paid over to you.

For example, if you agree to borrow £70,000 with an arrangement fee of £1,400 and legal fees of £600, you’ll end up with £68,000 actually landing in your bank account as the net advance. The exception is exit fees, which (as the name implies) are usually added at the end rather than deducted at the start.

As well as the fees, there’s the interest to think about. There are three ways to pay the interest on a bridging loan:

The lender may give you a choice of which method you prefer, or might insist on a certain method being used. Each method has its own pros and cons:

Withholding the interest is a good option if you’ve got plenty of LTV headroom, because it keeps your total interest cost down and saves you from having to make monthly payments.

For example, say you need to end up with £50,000 in the bank and you have a property worth £100,000. If we imagine that the total interest cost comes to £10,000 and the fees are £2,000, you could ask for a total loan (or gross advance) of £62,000 (62%). That way, after deducting the interest and fees, you’d end up with a net advance of the £50,000 you need.

This wouldn’t work so well if you wanted to end up with £70,000 in the bank – because most lenders’ maximum LTV is 70%. After borrowing £70,000 and deducting the interest and fees, you’d end up with much less.

Rolling up the interest maximises the amount of money you get at the start, and saves you from making monthly payments. However, you end up paying more interest in total because it compounds during the loan term: effectively, your loan is increasing month-on-month which increases your interest payments.

For example, the repayments on a 12 month, £100,000 loan with interest charged at 0.75% per month will be £750 per month. Each month that you don’t actually pay this £750 (because you’re rolling it up), it gets added on to your balance: so the first payment will be £750, the second will be £755.63 (0.75% of £100,750), and so on.

As a result of this compounding, the total interest payable at the end will be £109,380.09 – compared with £109,000 if you hadn’t allowed it to roll up (in other words, you’d either withheld it or serviced it).

If you want to roll up, the lender will generally want the amount you owe at the end to fall within their LTV limit. So in the example above, you’ll end up owing just over £109,000. If their maximum LTV is 70%, your property would need to be worth at least £157,000 to support this £109,000 debt. On the other hand, if you made monthly payments instead of rolling up, you’d only owe £100,000 at the end so the property would need to be worth £143,000.

Servicing the interest is a good option if you’ve got the monthly cashflow to do so, because it doesn’t reduce the amount you can access at the start (like withholding) or compound your interest payments (like rolling up).

Servicing also allows you to take out a longer loan term, because if you opt for a 12 month rather than 6 month term (for example) you don’t end up with less at the start (because of more interest being deducted) or your overall borrowing being reduced (because of the rolled-up interest needing to fit inside the LTV cap).

There’s no “best” way to treat the interest – if you’re given the choice, the right option will depend on your circumstances and what you want to achieve.

Chapter 5

How to get a bridging loan

The process of taking out a bridging loan is really no different from buying a property with a mortgage – and it should be a lot faster...

Although you’re paying for the lender’s solicitor, you’ll also need to pay for your own solicitor to act for you. If you’re buying the property (you don’t already own it), the solicitor acting for you in the purchase will handle the lending element too.

The lender will ask your solicitor to send over all the information they usually obtain in the course of buying a property: searches, insurances, checks of the Land Registry, and so on. The lender’s solicitor will then double-check all this information, raise enquiries about anything that’s missing, then eventually approve the loan to be released.

At this point, your solicitor can exchange and complete on the transaction – with the lender sending the funds over in time for completion day.

This can all be done very quickly: it’s technically possible to complete a bridging transaction in under a week, which would never happen with a mortgage. That’s because there are so many elements that a mortgage lender will definitely want to look at (like your income and employment status), which a bridging lender will either ignore or look at in less detail.

A week is seriously pushing it though, and a few weeks or a month is more typical. The speed will be dictated by a number of different factors:

There can be huge variations depending on circumstances: I’ve been involved in bridging transactions that have taken about a week, and others that have dragged on for months. If you have a firm deadline (like in the case of an auction purchase), make sure the lender and your solicitor are both aware of this at the start. And like anything involving solicitors, don’t expect much to happen unless you’re chasing constantly.

In general though, given identical circumstances, some lenders are just faster than others. And – surprise surprise – the ones that are faster tend to have higher rates and fees.

Chapter 6

What to consider when taking out a bridging loan

There's a lot to think about when taking on any kind of debt, but for bridging these three questions are a good place to start...

Your next steps

As I said back at the start, people are confused and scared about bridging loans.

Hopefully you’re no longer confused. And you shouldn’t be scared either – as long as you know what you’re doing, and you’re confident in your exit strategy. It’s a powerful tool: dangerous in the wrong hands for sure, but it will help you to get great results if you know how to use it properly.

You might choose to look for projects specifically where you can use bridging to get a good deal – allowing you to compete with cash buyers. Or now you’re confident in what bridging is all about, you can have it as just another item in your toolkit to pull out if the right circumstances happen to come along.

To build on your confidence and understanding, you might want to check out my company – LendSwift. I’m not saying that we’re the cheapest (we’re not) or the best choice for everyone. But we are very clear in what we’ll lend and on what basis – so you can read through our terms to get a feel for what we require, and use it as a point of comparison when you evaluate other lenders.

You can also use our calculator to run through particular scenarios and see how much you can borrow and how much it will cost you (without having to give us your personal details), so you can play around with different deals as you come across them to see how bridging finance might be able to help